The Content Glut: Why It Stinks To Be King

11 02 2010

I’m flattered that Jack Myers has asked me to join his group at the always-interesting MediaBizBloggers.

The people who blog there are people I have a ton of respect for — Shelly Palmer, Cory Treffiliti, Jim Louderback, Matt Greene and a whole bunch of smart people from Group M among others.

It won’t be easy to keep up with a group this smart, but I’m going to try my best.

My first post is here.  I’m hoping to spark some discussion and so if you feel like commenting I’d be grateful.

Thanks!





The Digital Future of Magazines?

21 12 2009

UPDATE 2/21/10: New iPad demo from WIRED magazine.

==

When we got married 16 years ago, my wife and I subscribed to 7 magazines and read them all cover-to-cover. Plus, we’d buy more at the newsstand.

Today, we subscribe to just two.

Both pile up, unread, for months at a time.  Even The Atlantic Monthly, which I find both brilliant and entertaining. I feel lousy for not keeping up, but at least I’m supporting great journalism with my subscription dollars.

A lot of very smart people are working feverishly to restore the magazine business back to health.  Some friends passed me this intriguing video from a design house that has a slick-looking approach to the problem.

As good-looking as it is, for me it still misses the mark.

The problem isn’t that magazines aren’t slick enough or that they lack digital functionality. The problems is that magazines are a time-killing content medium in an age when we don’t have time to kill, and we’re already drowning in content.

My RSS feeder of free content is overflowing with stuff I can’t get to. I’ll bet yours is, too.

The Design Idea At 7:35

But just when I was getting ready to close the window and abandon the video, something cool happened. It’s at 7:35 in.

Now THERE’S something potentially revolutionary and useful: little intriguing chunks of quick, easily digestible content in a fun interface. That genuinely feels like a fun experience, and doesn’t fall into the trap of “but it has to feel like a magazine”. It reminds me, in a good way, of the Babelgum iPhone app.

The interface idea at 7:35, especially if some of the items were video, feels like it has the potential to be a winner.  What do you think?

UPDATE: Micah Baldwin, a friend of mine from The Internet Oldtimers Foundation, had a smart observation about the design which he has agreed to let me share:

“(this design commits) what I consider to be the cardinal sin of any web app today. It creates a uni-directional relationship. Its between the reader and content, but doesn’t take into account other readers. Basically, the concept of social. The recreation of the water cooler online.

What if the reader allowed for communication and conversation?

Now, the NatGeo piece I read on pygmies could be shared and discussed with my friends that I know are into the subject. Time and speed are now on my side.”





The CPG Digital Marketer’s Resource Page

26 11 2008

It’s easy to get overwhelmed by the day-to-day of our jobs.

But if we don’t stay smart about what’s happening in CPG, we’re not actually doing our jobs. Fortunately, there are a few billion resources out there to make it easier for us to make ourselves smarter.

Below is a completely spurious side-by-side brain scan of a marketer at a major CPG company.

The scan on the left was taken immediately before consulting these resources. The scan on the right? Immediately after.

brains

OK, it’s time to feed your head. Dig in.

CONSUMER PACKAGED GOODS: INTERACTIVE AND SOCIAL MEDIA

CONSUMER PACKAGED GOODS: ADVERTISING

CONSUMER PACKAGED GOODS: NEWS

CONSUMER PACKAGED GOODS: RETAIL

CONSUMER PACKAGED GOODS: JOBS

FORRESTER: ALL THEIR FREE RESEARCH ON ONE PAGE

Are there great resources I’ve missed? Please let me know and I’ll update this page.





The Twitter Election: Three Lessons For Marketers

3 10 2008

If you listen carefully these days, you can hear the subtle sounds of something very fundamental shifting.

It’s the sound of keyboards clicking, iPhones beeping, TweetDecks purring. Welcome to the Twitter Election.

The political debates are happening in real time, both on the stage and around the world. Opinions are being shifted on a Tweet by Tweet basis.

The Digital Back Fence and The Mainstream Media Are Merging

How it impacts your marketing depends a lot on whether your brand says “Hi, I’m A McCain” or “Hi, I’m an Obama” (more on that soon, I’m still thinking through exactly what I want to say on the subject.)

There was a time when print or TV pundits told us who won or lost a debate. Today, the Digital Back Fence (social media like Twitter and Facebook and YouTube etc) and readily available digital editing tools have made the gap between event and analysis, between gaffe and parody, disappear.

As Brandon from Octane Interactive notes:

“In 2004 Facebook had just launched and was open to college students only, and YouTube didn’t even exist! These two sites alone have totally changed the game…”

The Power Of Instant Political Parody

On September 25, Katie Couric interviewed Sarah Palin. 10 days later, this devastatingly funny political parody video mashing up Palin’s voice and video of Miss Teen USA’s famous flop answer hit YouTube.

Social Media, Meet TV.

And it’s not just online. Have you seen what’s happening with Hack The Debate? Current and Twitter are putting TV and social media together in an entirely new way. This radically alters expectations: we no longer expect to watch debates. We expect to be IN debates.

CPG Marketers: Watch Closely. But Don’t Draw The Wrong Conclusions.

John McClain and Mr. Clean may look alike. But from a new marketing perspective, they’re not exactly the same commodity.

People are more passionate about politics than cleaning products. And, the stakes are higher.

Still, I think 3 lessons can be learned:

  1. People’s expectations about participating with media are fundamentally changing. What do our customers care about? How can we get them involved with our products? What conversations do our consumers think we belong in, and which should we steer clear of?
  2. The split in how we consume media is widening daily. McCain voters largely get their news from TV. Obama voters largely get their news from new media sources. How a consumer thinks the world works is radically impacted by where they get their news. Which mass medium — TV or digital? — does your consumer live in?
  3. The people at your company and your agencies need to live in both worlds. If you have a young creative team and a product with an older consumer, how well can they understand the worldview of that consumer? Conversely, if you have an older creative team for a product aimed at younger consumers, how good will their understanding be? As a professional duty, I believe that people at all parts of the process on both the marketer and agency sides need to spend a little time in both media worlds every day. Left to my own devices, I would watch a whole lot less TV than I do. The reason I watch is because I need to understand what that’s like, and how different the world looks from that POV.

It’s a new world. Very exciting stuff. How are you dealing with it?





How To Do A CPG Launch Without TV

12 09 2008

Karl Greenberg reports in yesterday’s Media Post that Procter & Gamble will be launching the new Oral-B Pulsonic toothbrush entirely through digital, PR, events, print and in-store. They’re giving TV the toothbrush-off: it’s not part of the launch at all.

It’s not a typical P&G move, but I think it’s very smart. Here’s why:

  • Real News Means Real PR. We all think we have revolutionary products, but in reality the media has seen most of them before. Oral-B has genuine news. In 2002, Ries and Ries argued in “The Fall of Advertising and the Rise of PR“, that giant brands like Palm, Starbucks, the Body Shop, Wal-Mart, Red Bull and Zara have been built with virtually no advertising at all. These brands didn’t have ads, but they did have a different story to tell.
  • In The Mommy Blogger Sweet Spot. This has a beauty story (whitens teeth in two weeks) AND a healthy kids story (a toothbrush kids will want to use). Plus, it’s a very high-value trial item.
    The only way this could be more suited to the blogosphere would be if it was a Mac-branded tech product that let ugly teenage boys instantly date supermodels.
  • Bigger Cash Register Rings = More Patient Retailers. Normally, you need TV at launch because the trade has no patience for a slow build. But when your suggested retail is $70, you don’t need a whole lot of velocity to make it worth the retailer’s while.

Don’t be surprised if the “TV is dead” crowd online trumpets this as incontrovertible proof that digital has at last killed TV once and for all. But, don’t believe the hype either.

This is the most traditional thing you can imagine: P&G being a smart marketer.





9-11

11 09 2008

If there is to be peace in the world,
There must be peace in the nations.

If there is to be peace in the nations,
There must be peace in the cities.

If there is to be peace in the cities,
There must be peace between neighbors.

If there is to be peace between neighbors,
There must be peace in the home.

If there is to be peace in the home,
There must be peace in the heart.

Lao Tzu (570-490 B.C.)

Photo Credit: Bitzi





Ad Age Mobile Roundtable

9 09 2008

An unusually useful article on mobile in today’s Ad Age: less “pie-in-the-handset” and much more “here’s what’s actually being done and how it’s working”.

Excellent, commonsense advice from Ogilvy’s Maria Mandel:

“A consumer is looking for one of three things. (…) information (…) entertainment (or) community (…) building interaction between people using their mobile devices?

Full article is here.





5 Secrets To Kellogg’s Special ROI

8 09 2008

Mark Baynes, CMO of Kellogg’s, recently made a pretty stunning announcement:

“analysis of the Special K initiative of the last 18 months showed digital media exceeding that of broadcast ROI”… “by a factor of well over two.”

Mr. Baynes offered no details about how ROI was calculated, which is too bad. Getting to a concrete ROI in CPG in any medium is extremely difficult. (Believe me on this: I can show you the scars). I’m very curious how they got to more than 2x ROI vs. TV and hope more is revealed soon.

Nor did he say much about what they did right online. I have no inside information about what worked and what didn’t. But that won’t stop me from offering some educated guesses:

Secret 1: Give The Brand A Digital Mission

Special K is not just a bowl of crunchy cereal and a few line extensions. It’s a diet partner with an explicit, concrete promise: drop up to a jean size in 2 weeks. That’s compelling stuff, and it gives its digital efforts a digital reason for being. Few people are interested in going to a website that lays out product features. Many people are interested in visiting a website that can keep them from looking ginormous in their jeans.

Secret 2: Understand “View Vs. Do”

As I’ve said before, TV is a “view” medium: “I’ve got some time to kill, let’s see what’s on”. The Internet is a “do” medium: “I’ll check the scores on ESPN, return some emails, and post to my blog.”

Instead of a list of features and benefits, Kellogg’s Special K website offers customized plans for consumers, sign-ups for a Yahoo e-mail group, and tips from a trainer and nutritionist. They don’t just say “view our promises about your diet”. They help consumers do something that matters.

Secret 3: Integrate Brand and Search

Kellogg’s deal with Yahoo is genius: a search turns up a paid search ad that works more like a brand ad. It’s full of “what can we do to help you?” which is exactly what’s needed in this medium. Did they give up something by not going with Google, considering how dominant Google is in search? Yes. But, remember that if you do a search for “Special K” on Google you will get more results about ketamine than about the brand.

Secret 4: Don’t Get Suckered Into Either/Or Thinking

Kellogg’s ROI online is heavily influenced by their TV advertising. Kellogg’s ROI on TV is almost certainly influenced by what they do online. The guys in Battle Creek aren’t arguing over whether to do TV or online. They’re doing both.

Point two of this: you could argue that some of this is more PR than advertising, or more promotion than PR, or more display than search. But, while you were arguing your ROI would not improve by one tenth of one percent. The lesson? Focus on what works, not what tactical bucket the idea belongs in.

Secret 5: Test, Learn and Improve

Kellogg’s has been working digitally for years. Their ROI improvement didn’t come overnight. Neither will yours, or mine.





Open Systems Advertising: Campaigns as Chameleons

3 09 2008

As the worlds of advertising and technology converge inexorably, it’s not just changing how we communicate. It must also change how we think.

In the Mad Men era, advertising was a closed system. PC Week defines this as: “A system in which (specs) are kept secret… It inhibits third-party software from being installed; it keeps third-party hardware from interoperating with it, and it prevents third-party enhancements from improving the product.”

The Closed System: Campaigns as Cathedrals

Advertisers had all the power. What digital consumers now take for granted: researching alternatives, reading reviews, comparing prices, giving feedback – was slow and painful, if you could do it at all.

Manufacturers built ad messages like cathedrals: massive, ornate, lasting forever. Consumers would worship there, if only because they had no alternative.

The Open System: Campaigns as Chameleons

Advertising is becoming a more open system.

PC Week defines an open system as one that “allows third parties to make products that plug into or interoperate with it. (…) the PC is an open system, (but) the fundamental standards are controlled by Microsoft Intel and AMD.”

That’s a pretty radical shift. What are the implications?

  1. Advertising will be messier with more inputs and outputs than ever. This is not temporary; it’s the future. Making the chaos look simple is our new job.
  2. Advertising should be created with change in mind. We need to look for new ways for consumers to plug into or interoperate with it.
  3. Marketing you can’t “plug into” will probably look to a consumer like it’s broken.
  4. BUT advertisers must continue to control the “fundamental standards”. The idea that consumers own our brands 100% and that we must give up control entirely is both dangerous and irresponsible
  5. Production costs need to radically shrink to match the expected useful life of the message.

Perhaps the most important shift is that must abandon the idea that we can use rigorous market research to guarantee success.

Instead, we should borrow a management technique from the technology business. Let’s learn how to fail as quickly and cheaply as possible. That’s the open source way, and it works.

P.S. Think the true mark of a genius is that they always get it right the first time? Nope.

A good article in Discover Magazine says Einstein made a lot of mistakes. In fact, they list 23 big ones. If we’re not making mistakes, we should be asking ourselves if we’re pushing for progress hard enough. We should be making at least as many mistakes as a genius.

Chronology of Einstein’s Mistakes

  1. 1905 Mistake in clock synchronization procedure on which Einstein based special relativity
  2. 1905 Failure to consider Michelson-Morley experiment
  3. 1905 Mistake in transverse mass of high-speed particles
  4. 1905 Multiple mistakes in the mathematics and physics used in calculation of viscosity of liquids, from which Einstein deduced size of molecules
  5. 1905 Mistakes in the relationship between thermal radiation and quanta of light
  6. 1905 Mistake in the first proof of E = mc2
  7. 1906 Mistakes in the second, third, and fourth proofs of E = mc2
  8. 1907 Mistake in the synchronization procedure for accelerated clocks
  9. 1907 Mistakes in the Principle of Equivalence of gravitation and acceleration
  10. 1911 Mistake in the first calculation of the bending of light
  11. 1913 Mistake in the first attempt at a theory of general relativity
  12. 1914 Mistake in the fifth proof of E = mc2
  13. 1915 Mistake in the Einstein-de Haas experiment
  14. 1915 Mistakes in several attempts at theories of general relativity
  15. 1916 Mistake in the interpretation of Mach’s principle
  16. 1917 Mistake in the introduction of the cosmological constant (the “biggest blunder”)
  17. 1919 Mistakes in two attempts to modify general relativity
  18. 1925 Mistakes and more mistakes in the attempts to formulate a unified theory
  19. 1927 Mistakes in discussions with Bohr on quantum uncertainties
  20. 1933 Mistakes in interpretation of quantum mechanics (Does God play dice?)
  21. 1934 Mistake in the sixth proof of E = mc2
  22. 1939 Mistake in the interpretation of the Schwarzschild singularity and gravitational collapse (the “black hole”)
  23. 1946 Mistake in the seventh proof of E = mc2

P.P.S. Not to brag, but there’s no way I would have made mistake 22. I’d have to know what the Schwarzschild singularity is in the first place, and I don’t.





Google Chrome Vs. Privacy Police, Microsoft Vs. Advertisers

2 09 2008

Fascinating, potentially important stuff going on in the browser wars. You can’t swing a computer mouse in the air without smacking into an implication for advertising, privacy, mobile web, etc etc. 

Links here, if (like me) you’re still catching up after the Labor Day weekend.

 








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.